Pros and Cons of Different Valuation Methods

Standard Price without Material Ledger

Transaction Without Material Ledger
Pros
  • Inventory valuation always at a frozen price
  • Simple and intuitive
Cons
  • Actual costs are not considered
  • Identifying the variances that are reflected in the price changes remains difficult, as the analysis of the detail throughout the supply chain cannot be obtained
  • Consumption always shown at standard price value

 

 

Variable Price without Material Ledger

Pros

  • Inventory valuation automatically adjusted to actual price
  • Consumption shown at moving average value

Cons

  • When price varies frequently, the consumption doesn’t show the moving average value in absence of stock coverage for the period.
  • Prices remain unrealisticand in some cases it is impossible to understand the link between the final price and the purchase price.



 

 

Transaction With Material Ledger

Periodic Balance Sheet with Material Ledger

Transactions with periodic balancing / ML

click to enlarge pictures
  Pros
  • Realistic prices: valuation of inventory at monthly average and valuation of movements such as, for example, goods receipts, at actual prices.
  • Consumption value for cost objects at monthly average price consistent with the value at time of Material Ledger close.
Cons
  • Activation of Material Ledger required, which leads to inevitable complexity.
  • Postings in FI directed to a parallel set of accounts. 
  • When unexpected results show, it is very difficult to understand where the issue generated from (e.g. goods receipt with a different value than expected)




 

News

Event

IM&C at the Swiss Supply Hubs 2014

Webinar

Transfer Pricing

Newsletter

subscribe

 

Home
FAQ
Contact
Sitemap

 

Follow us on:

    Delicious


Search

Print this Page Print this Page







Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
Home      Datenschutz      Impressum      © IM&C GmbH